Tony Freeman is just that—a free man. On May 2, the University of Iowa announced in a press release that that their leading returning scorer requested, and was granted, a scholarship release from the UI.
Why did he ask to be released?
From everything I have read or heard it seems Freeman was very worried about the amount of playing time he was going to receive next season, as well as the fact that he was not going to be a captain. So he decided to leave.
And he isn’t leaving quietly.
Obviously, any time a new coach takes over a program, no matter the sport, there is going to be a transition period or what coaches will conveniently refer to as a “rebuilding year.” Sometimes it doesn’t take a whole year. Sometimes it takes longer. Players have to acquaint themselves with the coach and his system, and the coach has to do the same with the players. It can be tough to accomplish without a lot of frustration and failure.

It was blatantly obvious throughout the entire 2007 season (head in his hands, helplessly looking at his assistant coaches in disbelief, or calling a timeout during the first possession of the game) that Coach Todd Lickliter was frustrated with the way his Iowa Hawkeyes adapted to his style of basketball (stingy man-to-man defense, unselfish set offense, with quick ball movement, and the highest quality shot late in the shot-clock), or what I will call, the “Lickliter way.”
Furthermore, on numerous occasions during games this past season, because of the way Freeman played (sporadic shots, shaky turnovers, head down attempting to take a defender one-on-one with open players elsewhere on the court), he and Lickliter seemed to be on two completely different pages. Freeman claims he didn’t know Lickliter had any frustration with the way he played. He is the only on then, that didn’t know that.
Moreover, the hostile verbal bouts on the bench between Freeman and coaches or fellow teammates seemed to be yet another convincing indication that there was a problem. The more you watched, the more it seemed as if Freeman wasn’t buying into the Lickliter way, voluntarily. And that aggravated both the coaches and the players.
Upon hearing that Tony Freeman was not selected as one of next year’s captain, even though there was clearly a problem, I was somewhat surprised. However, the more I hear from those within the program, the more I approve of coach Lickliter’s decision.
Would Freeman, the same guy that couldn’t even wait for the locker room to bitterly quarrel with teammates; the same guy that uncooperatively played his own free-for-all, Steve Alford style of basketball; the same guy that wasn’t buying in when everyone else seemed to be making an effort to transition; really be the appropriate captain?
Allegedly (Des Moines Register article), Lickliter’s season-long frustration with his inability to play within the system spiraled into an eye-brow-raising question posed to Freeman, by Lickliter, during an off-season meeting.
According to Freeman, Lickliter asked him if he ever thought about transferring to a different school. It is unclear as to what context Lickliter’s comments were made in, but it was no secret that Tony was upset.
He told the Des Moines Register, “He asked me about my grades and then he asked me did I ever think about transferring.”
"I know I have some bad habits on the floor, but could they at least have told me during the season and talked to me about it then?
"In the meeting, I was like, 'Coach, I want to be here,' but I also wanted to be respected."
"Basically, the conversation I had with him insinuated that I wasn't compatible with the system that he's trying to run," said Freeman
"They didn't tell me my playing time was going to be diminished," Freeman said. "They just told me I was stuck in my own ways.
"I didn't play the way they wanted me to play, I guess, and as a competitor - as a guy that's been here so long - I could see what was happening. Coach Lickliter has my playing time in the palm of his hands.
"A guy can only take so many hits."
It makes very little sense that for no apparent reason Lickliter, or any coach for that matter, would want to drive off their leading returning scorer (he didn’t get into legal trouble, had sufficient grades, ect.). It does make sense for a coach to feel the need to clear the air about rumors that have been surrounding Tony and his future at Iowa since the culmination of the season.
Tony may not have bought into the system, which isn’t ideal, but it’s a salvageable situation with willing cooperation from player and coach.
It was not secret, when Todd Lickliter was hired, that he taught a much contrasting style of basketball than that of the prior regime. If Freeman didn’t think it suited him, or if he wasn’t interested in modifying and adapting to Lickliter's tried and trusted way, he could have very easily joined Tyler Smith, Craig Neal, and the Alford family on the plane out of Iowa City back in March 2007, but he didn’t.
That was his mistake.
Now, because of Freeman’s inability, some are left to unfairly question Todd Lickliter’s motives; just another detrimental dent to a young, aspiring, and developing program; something that separates an already divided fan base.
However, I am hesitant to question Lickliter’s motives. I believe they were, and are, pure. It’s my opinion that Freeman was unwilling to transition to the Lickliter “way,” and felt the need to mask that by quoting Lickliter out of context in order to make it seem like he was being coarsely forced out. Or, like he told the Des Moines Register, to make it seem like he had just been hit with too much (coaches always on him, tension between certain teammates, not being selected a captain), that he had to leave.
Like Freeman in Lickliter’s system, I’m not buying it.
Regardless, Freeman will be free of any ridicule or rough time that the UI basketball team may face in what would have been his final season. He will be free of half empty arenas and another “rebuilding year.” He will be free of televisions money-grubbing moguls, purging young potential Hawkeye fans who instead will ask their parents if they can watch Ohio State or Florida.
But proudly stuck in my lifelong Hawkeye ways, I won’t be free of any of that.
If only being a fan worked like a scholarship, I might just ask for a release from the Iowa Hawkeyes, not root for a team for a year, and jump aboard with Ohio State, or maybe Florida, next year.

They seem to have something a fan craves—winning.
I think I could very easily adapt to their style.